writing for a modern audience header

4 Challenges of Writing for a Modern Audience

writing for a modern audienceSometimes I think everything I learned about life I learned from The Andy Griffith Show.

For instance, in the episode “Andy Discovers America,” when Andy is incredulous about the new school teacher “starting them awful young for history,” Aunt Bea just sighs, “Well, maybe they have to. There’s more of it these days.”

If that idea was true of history back in 1963, it’s even more true of literature in 2019.

One of the coolest things about this ultra-modern era is the insane number of stories literally at our fingertips. It’s staggering. Not only are we able to access the vast archives left to us by hundreds of ancestral generations, we are also living at an unprecedented moment of story output. Stories of all sorts—books, movies, TV, commercials, you name it—are created at a brain-numbing rate. Even those of us nerdy enough of to try could never sample them all.

This is incredible in so many ways. That I can decide I want to read Of Mice and Men, borrow it from Overdrive, and download it on my Kindle in all of three minutes (or less—I didn’t count) would no doubt astound John Steinbeck. Heck, these days we sometimes don’t even have to wait a week for a new episode of our favorite show. The latest season of Stranger Things? Pow. Watch the whole thing in one night.

And then what? What happens after I finish reading Of Mice and Men? After I finish bingeing Stranger Things? Well, I start looking for something else, of course. And something else and something else.

After a while, the stories we consume in our lifetimes rack up considerably. In 2002, I started tracking the number of books I read. At this point, I’ve recorded 1,777. Add to that the books I consumed before keeping a record. Then add what has to be at least twice as many movies. Plus TV (including many, many Andy Griffith reruns…).

Nearly everyone with access to either the Internet and/or a TV can probably say the same.

That’s a mountain of stories. An ocean of stories. A galaxy of stories.

But here’s the interesting thing. The more stories We the Audience consume, the more jaded we are likely to become in our consumption.

What’s this mean for We the Writers?

Basically this: today’s audience ain’t Granddad’s audience.

4 Challenges of Writing for a Modern Audience

Writers who are pointed to the exemplary writing of the classics often complain that the likes of Thomas Hardy and Edna Ferber couldn’t possibly get published these days. There’s some truth to that, in no small part because modern audiences are a far different crowd from those of a couple hundred years ago. (This is not to discount the continuing worth of the great classics. The evolution of the modern audience is firmly founded on all the literature that has come before.)

However, as modern authors writing for a modern audience, we must be aware of the unique challenges that face us, not only in connecting with the current audience, but also in recognizing the formative effects upon ourselves as members of that same contemporary audience.

You can start by taking note of these four crucial facts.

1. Modern Audiences Are Inundated With Stories

Generally speaking, the modern audience is pretty story savvy. They’ve seen it all, or at least feel like they have. And they believe (often rightly) that they are qualified to judge what they’ve seen or read, not just on a personal level, but on a technical level.

What This Means: It’s much harder for writers to pull off the old magic tricks. The audience not only knows someone’s working the levers behind the curtain, they also know exactly where the curtain is and how to pull it back.

At this point, audiences know every twist in the book. They have evolved super-smell when it comes to sniffing out foreshadowing. The gimmicks that might have wowed audiences of yesteryear are now seen as boring or even manipulative.

It’s true the story-consuming public may not understand all the conscious techniques of good story theory or storytelling, but they often do have an even better instinctive grasp of what’s working and what’s not than do those actually doing the writing.

What to Do About It: The only thing you can do to get a modern audience member to pay attention to your story, much less approve of it, is to write your guts out.

It’s not enough to write a good-enough story. Every single one of you reading this blog right now has read and watched hundreds of good-enough stories. Some of them you can name (probably just because they made you mad). Most of them you’ve relegated to the waste bin in the back your brain to save on cognitive space.

Write something brilliant. Write something original. Write something true. And most of all: write something packed full of so much quality that it stands out like a Thoroughbred in a lineup of burros.

2. Audiences Are Inundated With Subpar Storytelling

As awesome-sauce as it may be to live in an era with unlimited stories, it has its downsides. The biggest is simply that quality stories are ever-increasingly difficult to find amidst all the quantity.

The self-publishing boom of the early 2000s treated me well as an author, so I hate to knock it. But as a reader, it has turned out to be kind of a bummer. It’s frustrating and often defeating to have to scroll through page after page of the kind of ramshackle cover art that too often signals equally ramshackle storytelling.

But it’s not just that the Gatekeeper is dead and the Gates are down. Traditional publishing, Hollywood, indie filmmaking, and TV aren’t much better. There are shining gems out there to be sure. But the rubbish is piled so high and so wide, it’s hard for audiences not to grow increasingly jaded—and to some extent, numb.

What This Means: Modern audiences don’t have a lot of trust in their storytellers. After a certain point, they tend to assume (consciously or unconsciously) that any new story they try will probably disappoint them.

For example, going to the theater used to be a highlight event for me. I loved it. But somewhere in the last 5-10 years, I stopped going. I realized one day (after the extraneous debacle that was Jason Bourne) that I was increasingly disappointed with what I was experiencing whenever I sat down in a darkened theater. It wasn’t a highlight any longer.

In Secrets of Story, Matt Bird points out:

…every time an audience reads a bad book, watches a bad movie, or attends a bad play, it just gets harder for the next writer, because the audience is increasingly reluctant to care again.

What to Do About It: There’s both bad news and good news here.

The bad news, of course, is that if your audience is anywhere over the age of 15, you’re probably facing an uphill battle. They came, they saw—and they judged most of what they saw to be unworthy of their time and money. At this point, your story is going to be a hard sell to just about anybody (even your mom, if she’s honest).

The good news, however, is there’s a lot of room at the top. If you can climb the rubbish heap and hold aloft your polished gem of a story, the audience will enshrine you. (For better or worse, good marketing is also instrumental and, usually, indispensable.)

The first thing to do in the face of an increasingly tough audience is to refuse to give up. The second is to commit yourself to the long haul of writing a truly excellent story. Do it for yourself and for your audience, but do it also for  your fellow writers. As Bird pointed out, bad writing is hurtful to all writers. One writer’s good story, however, makes it that much more likely another writer’s good story may also get its chance with that same audience.

3. Audiences Are Accustomed to (and to Some Degree Accepting of) Subpar Storytelling

Audience members may curtail some of their story habits due to disproportionate experiences with subpar stories, but they’re unlikely to quit cold turkey. Even if it weren’t all but impossible to opt out of stories in our media-driven culture, few people actually want to. We love stories so much we’d rather settle for poor stories than give them up altogether.

The problem here is that audiences—including the writers who are members of those audiences—become complacent in their acceptance of subpar work. How many times have we chosen a book or gone to a movie, knowing it was probably less-than-great—but it’s all that was available at the moment? When we are inundated with enough of these problematic offerings, we start expecting them, and then we start accepting them.

Netflix Expectation vs. Reality

What This Means: For my money, the most insidious problem with this scenario is that these pervasive subpar stories are the ones writers are now learning from. For starters, many of these stories are extremely famous and profitable. So it would seem evident these are the stories we should all be imitating.

Furthermore, by their very ubiquity, these stories are becoming part of our era’s archetypal narrative. We are permeated with these stories. They inhabit our subconscious—which is the incubator for our own ideas and instinctive understanding of story. Even if we’re not taking all these stories seriously, we’re still gobbling them up by the hundreds. And you know what they say: we are what we eat.

I will often observe or participate in discussions in which a new writer will argue against good advice with the insistence that “[such and such a popular story] did it this way!” If pressed, a few more supporting examples might even be produced. At the risk of sounding too Mom-like, let me put it this way: just because a famous (and perhaps otherwise brilliant) author did something stupid doesn’t mean you should too.

What to Do About It: This is exactly why it is so important for authors to be not just members of the audience, but conscious members. Become a keen observer of your own reactions to the stories you read and watch. What do you like? What do you not like? What are you perhaps unconsciously accepting just because? And, most importantly, why? Why does something work? Why does something not work? And… how could it work better?

Writing well is no accident. It is what happens when an author is purposefully conscious of the effects of any given story and its techniques.

Let me also say this: you’ll have a better chance of keeping your writing healthy if you’re eating more veggies than candy. The occasional “junk” movie or “stupid” book, just because that’s the mood you’re in, is fine. But if that’s the bulk of your story intake, you’re in trouble. If you want to be great, learn from the greats, not the oh-well-this-isn’t-amazing-but-it’s-all-we-have-so-we’ll-just-make-do.

4. Audiences Think They Like New and Shiny

Storytelling is so glam these days. So many gorgeous book covers. So many stylish new visuals in the movies. So many hot modern actors with their hot modern haircuts. I’ll admit to stocking my Kindle with beautiful YA books that turned out to be a year’s worth of really bad reading. I’ll also admit (in a much more mumbly voice) to watching Nicholas Sparks movies just because the lead actors are beautiful.

When browsing shelves at the library, it’s so much more tempting to pick up something with a shiny new cover versus this:

Wuthering Heights Emily Bronte Penguine Classic

Or some vapid new action movie versus this:

Judgment at Nuremburg

What This Means: Here are two anecdotes from my own experiences as an easily-distracted member of the modern audience.

As a reader, I took a break from my long-term pursuit of reading the classics. I was going through some difficult life stuff, and I just wanted to read “easy” and “fun” fiction for a while. So I chased after the pretty covers and found that, sure enough, easy though they might be, they started giving me a cotton-candy feeling in my stomach after a while.

So I decided to go back to the proven masterpieces for a bit. I chose Edith Wharton’s Age of Innocence, dove in, and from the very first paragraph experienced an almost palpable sense of the satisfaction that only good writing can create. No, Wharton’s not “easy.” She’s not even particularly “fun.” But in comparison to all that fluff I’d been distracting myself with, she was incredibly rewarding.

Same thing happened to me as a watcher. The simplest metric for knowing whether or not I’m engaged in a movie is whether or not I reach for my phone. If I’m bored, the phone comes out. I’m looking up the actors’ bios or the story’s factual context or the trivia on IMDb. But if I never pick up the phone, it means I’m hooked.

After a recent library visit when I brought home about an equal number of modern versus “old” movies, I was fascinated to find myself on the phone in the middle of almost all the modern movies. But Bette Davis and Edward G. Robinson? I was rapt. The phone never got so much as a fingerprint on it.

If there’s a moral here, it’s this. Audiences don’t always choose the stories they should, even when they know better. Mostly, however, this is because the new stuff and the good stuff isn’t overlapping as prodigiously as it could.

What to Do About It: Again, good news, bad news.

The bad news is audiences are easily swayed by pretty things. In an age of short attention spans, new and shiny often seems much more interesting than old and proven. Marketing is king, because marketing is how readers and viewers find the content. If the marketing seems good, then the audience believes (often even when they know better) that the content should follow suit.

On the other hand, the good news is that because you live in this pretty modern age, there’s no reason your pretty book cover or stylish script can’t be the next shiny thing to snag the audience’s attention.

The catch, of course, is that you want your story to do more than catch your audience’s eye. You want it to keep their attention. And that requires, first, an awareness of the type and quality of stories—new and old—that capture and keep your attention. Write those stories, and write them well.

Wordplayers, tell me your opinions! What do you think is the greatest challenge of writing for a modern audience? Tell me in the comments!

Click the “Play” button to Listen to Audio Version (or subscribe to the Helping Writers Become Authors podcast in iTunes).

Sign Up Today

hwba sidebar pic

Sign up to receive K.M. Weiland’s e-letter and receive her free e-book Crafting Unforgettable Characters: A Hands-On Introduction to Bringing Your Characters to Life.

About K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland

K.M. Weiland is the award-winning and internationally-published author of the acclaimed writing guides Outlining Your Novel, Structuring Your Novel, and Creating Character Arcs. A native of western Nebraska, she writes historical and fantasy novels and mentors authors on her award-winning website Helping Writers Become Authors.

Comments

  1. Thank you for your outstanding post. Could it be that the generations before us had, as a whole, a deeper allegiance to what really matters in life than does this generation? It has been said that the literature of a culture reflects the culture. Have we become a shallow, superficial society that can create only shallow, superficial literature? Has mediocrity replaced excellence? If so, then we must ask ourselves why?

    • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

      Let’s put it this way: I believe our modern culture faces many challenges to deeper living that our ancestors did not. For one thing, the prevalent commercialism of art, however convenient it may be for those of us who earn our living through it, has certainly had its effect on the creation process.

      • So here’s a question, prompted by an essay I saw over on tumblr a while back that kind of floored me, but…re: the effect of commercialism on art…have you considered taking a look at the difference between “mainstream” art, and fanfiction, when you talk about “modern audiences”?

        Because it was pointed out in this essay (“On Fanfic & Emotional Continuity”, is what it was titled) that GENRE-wise, they have distinctions between them that go well beyond copyright or originality of setting/characters.

        It has a LOT to do with their audiences being so incredibly different in terms of their tastes and what they “expect” or hope for in a story.

        Namely, the argument (pretty compelling for those of us who read/write a lot of fanfic) was that “fic” OFTEN has a much more relaxed stance on pacing or what people would usually think of as “plot structure”, and is almost always much more character-centered and character-driven than a lot of modern mainstream fiction (which is often “plot-driven”, and ideally, “tightly” plotted/paced, in contrast).

        It’s not that nobody who writes fanfic creates anything “tightly paced”, mind; it’s that plenty of people have plenty of happy readers without worrying about “pacing” at all! But ever since the 1960s with our “fandom grandmas” in the Star Trek Fandom, the depth and development and dynamics of characters, have been celebrated at the front and center of it

        Heck, it’s to the point where common Alternate Universe takes on casts of characters include things like “the coffee shop AU” or “the college AU” or even “modern AU” for fantastical settings (think LotR or Star Trek) – all stories where instead of envisioning some wacky physics or a world with dragons, inevitably the whole point is “here are the characters living their lives as Normal People… let’s see what happens!”

        What happens is often say, 40 chapters of wildly different lengths 90% of which is characters dancing around their feelings as they snark at each other and like…live their lives?

        Something that mainstream fiction readers would and often do decry as “terrible” pacing with “no” plot – but… that’s wrong.

        It HAS a plot: the plot IS the character development! And it’s not that the pacing is bad – it’s that it has the pacing not of a fairytale or an epic or a play, but of Life, with an ebb and flow, slow periods and fast ones, and maybe, yeah threads that go nowhere.

        Mainstream fiction lovers very often don’t like it. To some, many such stories would feel messy and “unstructured”, and have long stretches where “nothing seems to happen”.

        Fanfic readers LOVE it though, because there’s a bunch of Something happening on the character end. And it’s a noted thing among many of us that we gradually…just…stop reading as many “mainstream” books, because “fic” is more appealing?

        And the funny thing is, because of that and the sheer number of people in Fandoms around the world, I don’t think there’s zero market for this “commercially” – I just think nobody has managed to realize that there IS a massive market for this, and/or nobody knows how to market it in a market already dominated by “tightly plotted thrillers” the like with their perfectly balanced three-act structures and action-driven plots.

        So I guess my point is – you need to know WHICH modern audience you are talking about, because there’s at least two wildly different ones in English-speaking circles alone! 😉

        Do you write for the “mainstream” with expectations of Firm Structure and possibly Action-Driven Plots?

        Or for the people who gravitate to underground “fic”, with its relaxed expectations of pacing but you had better put the right emotions and complexity and development into your characters?

        Granted I think a “mainstream” writer at their best can often do stuff with characters that appeals to “fic” folks, too (heck, my favorite books and movies do exactly that; that’s why they’re my favorites!), but there’s definitely a difference in focus and what is considered “most important”. Ficcers often care less about pacing and MOST about characterization and the relationship dynamics between characters.

        PS, found an archived copy of that essay and some of its responses if you want to read it:

        https://web.archive.org/web/20190213055707/http://lynati.tumblr.com/post/182323400337/on-fanfic-emotional-continuity

        • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

          Interesting. I don’t read fan fic myself, so when I reference fiction generally, I’m talking about original works, whether intended for publication or not.

  2. Excellent post and and something I’m always thinking about–going deeper into the story for something new that will connect with readers.

    FYI – that’s also a favorite episode of mine, especially the look on Andy’s face when the “new teacher” walks into his office and puts him in his place. 😁😁

    • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

      I adore The Andy Griffith Show (or the first five seasons at any rate). So many gems, so many examples of great storytelling.

  3. Rudy Fisher says

    I am VERY interested in a blog post with a list of classics you recommend learning from. Considering how much of a handle your have on the craft, your recommendation is held in hogh regard! Thanks again for the great work!

    • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

      Ultimately, I find there’s something in just about every one that we can learn from. There’s always a reason for why we remember a particular book down through the years. Dickens, the Brontes, Austen, Hemingway, Faulkner, and so many others are worth reading.

      • Mary George says

        Joseph Mitchell for eloquence.
        Dorothy Parker for serious sass with literary excellence.
        Thomas Wolfe for autobiographical story and rhapsodic narrative.
        Jojo Moyes for sleek, contemporary style and theme mixed with humor.
        Kerouac for distinctive, cool and irreverent literary style.
        Yes to the Bronte sisters, Dickens and Jane Austen!
        Steinbeck, Vonnegut, Patchett, EB White, Heather Bergstrom, Somerset Maugham and Colum McCann . . . Frank McCourt, Ishiguro, Neruda, Charles Frazier, Toni Morrison, Rosamunde Pilcher. . . .

        Any self-published books from Amazon in your genre with high ratings, that could very well display commercial success hand-in-hand with cringe-worthy storytelling. It’s a lesson worth learning.

  4. Andrewis*still*editing says

    Yeah, this is one of your deepest posts yet.

    You might recall that I’m writing a kids’ fantasy series, essentially aimed at a Harry Potter audience that exists this decade. All along I’ve been conscious that I’m writing in a post-Rowling world; that if I’m lucky enough to pick up an audience, they’ll be savvy to anything I can try to hide within the pages. After all, their parents learned it with Harry.

    And that’s even assuming I can approach the skill and quality of an early Rowling, which is a long way from guaranteed.

    Today we’re also in a post-Martin world. Every week that Game of Thrones was on, there were over a hundred YouTube channels analysing the stuffing out of each and every word, and predicting what everything meant, especially given the extra background and story given in the books.

    And George have some STUFF in his books. Hard stuff, stuff a lot of good Christian folk don’t want to read about, frankly – and then even a heathen like me might find a bit strong. How do we reach an audience whose sensibilities have been so numbed already when there’d be little that surprises anymore? (Jaime & Cersei: yawn, seen it before).

    Now, don’t think I’m putting any of that in my kids’ series, but I won’t always be writing kids’ stuff. But I do know that even that can be darker and edgier than Potter was, because she already took us there by the end of her series, so the audience has already seen it. It’s almost like dealing drugs, I guess.

    I don’t have an answer, other than to say that I’m aware of it, and I guess if you’re taking it into account at least that’s something.

    • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

      I have a suspicion that this is all going to come full circle. The moment the grimdark stuff fully ceases to surprise us may well be the moment when it’s the Andy-Griffith stuff that starts surprising us all over again.

      • Andrewis*still*editing says

        I’m a little older than you, and I grew up watching black and white reruns of Andy Griffith. That whistling tune was a happy place 🙂

        • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

          I grew up with it too, thanks to reruns!

        • Just a thought here on the creative process. Shouldn’t you, as Katie suggests elsewhere, be taking your story in a different direction? I think a big problem is trying to “outdo” best selling authors by copying what they do. I would no more want to write a GoT “sequel” than a Harry Potter one. I know you say it is a fantasy and aimed at the generation that grew up with Harry and the like. OK, make it fantasy (I happen to like and write in that genre) but do something different.
          But maybe I misunderstood the issue you have. if I did, apologies.

  5. Tom Youngjohn says

    Get a Patreon account and I’ll give you $2 a month.

  6. Great post Katie. I’ve had the same feeling when recently (re-)reading successful books like ‘The Martian’ and ‘Ready Player One’ and then diving into novels by Heinlein, Neal Stephenson, Arthur C Clarke, Greg Bear etc. The former are ‘OK’ novels, with a good story to tell, but the authors really do keep the narrative simple in terms of sentence construction, grammar, vocabulary etc. It’s almost like they wrote it with an easy screenwriting adaption in mind, or was it to meet their audience’s/editor’s expectations, or is it just the natural way they write, which then does happen to successfully gel with their readers?

    So how short do sentences need to become to keep attracting a modern audience, more used to tweets and Instaposts? It now concerns me that, when penning novels of my own, I’m going to have to ‘dumb it down’ to make any headway in a crowded market. But doesn’t that just turn me into a newly-minted member of an ‘older’ generation exhibiting a form of writerly snobbery?

    You’ve rightfully highlighted a dilemma for me – and I suspect many others…

    • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

      I wouldn’t worry too much about sentence length. Write your own voice as well as you know how.

  7. Abbey Gepp says

    A book is one of the greatest wonders of world. Why are so many people fond of reading? The world of books is full of wonders. You and characters of books can find at yourselves in different countries and have a lot of adventures. The book is a faithful friend. They form our values and characters. We try to look like the characters of our favourite books: to be brave, honest, not to be silly and greedy, to be true friends. We enjoyed the beauty and wisdom of fairy-tales and fables when we were babies and Granny read them to us. They taught us to be kind, clever, hardworking, to understand other people and help them.

  8. Great stuff. It challenges me to push the boundaries of my stories. I want to be the best writer I can be. Reading stuff like your blog urges me on. Thank you.
    With regard to what I think is the greatest challenge for me writing for a modern audience, I think it must be to grab someone’s attention. Like you say, marketing is crucial; getting your story right in front of a willing reader. I found, when I was putting up stories on Wattpad that nobody found them, and when I went looking for others I only found teen stuff that seemed to be written without editing and was being praised by others who were writing similar stuff. I felt like the kid at school who shouts and shouts, but can’t get a hearing and can’t break in to the gang. I think this may be a bit of an odd angle to approach the question from, but as I’ve not yet published my first historical novel I don’t have any other first hand experience as a writer. As an audience member I instinctively know a great script and story from a so-so one. So I agree that they stand out, but they stand out in a sea of not-quite-so-goodness. But everyone’s got to learn somewhere. I recently submitted a drama script to the BBC Writersroom. I wasn’t asked to join their team. They sent a nice email saying thanks for trying and they shared they’d had over 3,000 scripts sent in. Wow!
    I need to challenge myself to rise through that pile of slush and to learn my craft so that I can bang louder on the gatekeepers’ gates. Marketing, though, remains a big challenge for me.

  9. Your blogs are my weekly writing energiser and as always this one didn’t disappoint. I grew up when there were just 2 TV channels in UK. Although there was mediocre stuff around even then, the lack of choice meant I was “forced” to watch the movie greats. Older films got more airtime than the new so I had seen exceptional films like Judgement at Nuremberg by the time I was in my early teens. They are worth watching by anyone just for the sheer satisfaction of immersing yourself in a high quality film but particularly by modern writers wanting to study the craft of storytelling. Even now I will rewatch Bette Davis in All about Eve.

  10. A general comment.

    For a start, I believe everything written in the post is basically true.

    What I wonder about is why given that there is so much poor quality stuff out there it isn’t under fire?

    By that, I mean look at Hollywood as an example. Fantastic budgets and they can buy the best. But the stories themselves lack the zap factor (as Ms Weiland has herself pointed out with her wonderful series on Marvel and story telling). Why are the scriptwriters allowed to produce single dimensional characters and predictable stories?

    In this regard, I am a little amused and saddened by the way GoT was thrashed by the screenwriters. And we have over 2 million fans petitioning for a remake when the series has just aired its last series and episodes. There is a craving for good, well thought through and executed story telling.

    I wonder if the repeated return to old classics and reboots of old movies isn’t an indication of a creative blind alley, particularly in commercially-orientated organisations.

    I have just finished reading a movie review for Thunder Road. At one point the reviewer said the following: “He gives us lightning flashes of wacky, mostly one-man portraiture instead of a multi-character glow of evolving narrative….Cummings shot it [movie] for $190,000 in 15 days. That sounds like a joke budget and a joke schedule. But the laughs may be on bloated film-makers who spend far more to produce far less.”

    Addressing the “art” in Thunder Road is about telling us something about our humanity, a facet of story telling that seems largely lost in big budgets. I suspect the same applies to a lot of writing. My wife loves literary fiction and we talk about her reads a lot. One thing that comes across is that the basics are often ignored even by established authors.

    Difficult times, indeed, for indie authors.

    And a thanks for a very thought provoking post.

    • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

      Good thoughts.

      I recently watched Eddie the Eagle and read in the IMDb trivia that the director decided to make it because “they don’t make movies like that anymore.” It’s the truth. When they do, it’s a breath of fresh air.

  11. Thanks for reading “The Secrets of Story” and for the link! I love your blog and podcast.

    • K.M. Weiland | @KMWeiland says

      Hey! Thanks for commenting. Really enjoying the book. I’ve enjoyed your insights from your blog from way back.

  12. Brilliant post.

    I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently. It’s really depressing that with our limited time and shrinking attention spans, most of us see reading as an investment, or an item on a checklist – including me.

    Jeff Goins wrote an article a few years ago (“Why The Hunger Games Is the Future of Writing”) where he talks about how books should be written to reflect that, which I disagree with. But that might be where the novel is headed. I’d really like to hear what you think about it.

  13. As a relative newcomer to the world of being a professional author, I’m finding your blog really fascinating, thank you x

  14. If I have zero will to write for the day, I can listen to a podcast or read a post, chapter, etc., about writing instead. So here I am. Thanks for the thoughtful podcast.

  15. Colin McIvor says

    Brilliant and thought provoking post as ever. I think the interesting thing about substandard writing is that I can read these books in literally a matter of hours if not less because it is easy to skip through so much of what is written and you really dint loose anything at all. I am however in the process of reading one of Terry Pratchett’s books for literally the 7th time and if i don’t read almost every paragraph i will miss some small detail that is important in maybe a couple of chapters. Also even on the 7th read I am finding new nuances and subplots. But, for me the acid test is that I can’t wait till bedtime so i can dip into the next chapter. That for me is the sign of a good book

  16. Movies are now more about social engineering than ever before. Like you stated in your essay, the this is the best you can get, so bend over mentality is designed to insist that we settle for less. Reminds me of that classic Ted Knight line from the old film “Caddyshack” when he’s admonishing his spoiled nephew Spaulding: “You’ll get nothing and like it!”

Trackbacks

  1. […] K.M. Weiland examines 4 challenges of writing for a modern audience. […]

  2. […] https://www.helpingwritersbecomeauthors.com/writing-for-a-modern-audience/ “Sometimes I think everything I learned about life I learned from The Andy Griffith […]

  3. […] 4 Challenges of Writing for a Modern Audience Writing Challenges: 18 Challenges Writers Face and How to Overcome Them […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.