If the first part of your sequel*—the reaction—appeals to your readers’ emotions, the second
part is all about the intellect. Once your character’s first-blush emotional
response to the previous scene’s
disaster has passed, he will have to get down to the all-important business of
thinking about what he’s going to do next. The previous disaster has left him in
quite a pickle. It was a catastrophic declaration; the dilemma, in response,
presents a question, “What do I do now?”
The Three Phases of the Dilemma
1. Review.
The protagonist will look back on the disaster and consider the missteps that allowed it to happen. This phase is often intertwined with the previous reaction section of the sequel. Its length will largely depend on its proximity to the disaster and the pace you wish to set. Sometimes a lengthy recap of the disaster may be repetitious. If readers have just experienced the disaster, they’ll hardly need a blow-by-blow recount so soon. However, if the sequel has been separated from the previous scene by a chapter or more (as might be the case if one or more alternating POVs occur in between), a recap will be valuable both in refreshing the readers’ memories and in grounding the character’s reaction.2. Analyze.
Once your character has progressed past his initial emotional reaction, he will have to take a deep breath, put on the ol’ thinking cap, and start considering the specifics of his problem. The dilemma will always present a question, the gist of which is, “How in thunderation do I get out of this mess?” But don’t settle for generalities. Figure out your character’s specific problem/question and make clear it enough that readers could verbalize it themselves if they had to. Your dilemma’s question should be as specific as, “How do I get out of this snake pit?” or “How do I get Joey to forgive me for lying to him?” or “How can I find money to buy groceries?”3. Plan.
Once your character has sufficiently analyzed the problem, he will move into the planning phase—which will then segue right into the next section of the sequel, the decision (which we’ll be discussing next week). This phase can occur instantaneously if your character hits upon the right plan right away, or it can occur over the course of several chapters. Your character might experiment with several options, only to cross them off his list of possibilities when they lead him to dead-ends.Options for Sequel Dilemmas
1. Implicit.
Sometimes readers will understand the dilemma well enough that it won’t have to be spelled out. Instead, to keep the pace fast, the character will move directly from reaction to decision.2. Explicit.
More often, you will want to take the time to flesh out the dilemma. This might require only a sentence or two, or you may dramatize it at length, using one of two approaches:a. Summary.
More often than not, a solid round of internal narrative will be enough to allow the character to consider his options and explain them to readers.b. Dramatization.
Some dilemmas will call for a more detailed examination. Your character may need to explore the dilemma over an extended period of time, either by talking to other characters or experimenting with solutions. Instead of playing out the options in his head and rejecting those that will not work, he can instead act out the options. He will run into a series of dead-ends until the appropriate (and, possibly, only) course of action presents itself.Questions to Ask About Your Sequel Dilemmas
1. Is the dilemma directly influenced by the disaster at the end of the previous scene?
2. Can the dilemma be stated in specific language (instead of just a general “what should I do now?”)?
3. Is the dilemma clear to readers, either through explicit examples or through the context?
4. Does the amount of time you spend on the dilemma match its importance within the plot?
5. If you’ve chosen to include a lengthy review section, does it avoid repetition?
Sequel Dilemmas in Action
Tell me your opinion: What is your character’s dilemma in your latest sequel?
Related Posts: Show and Tell
5 Ways to Pace Your Story
Why Narrative Isn’t a Bad Thing
_________________

Click the “Play” button to Listen to Audio Version (or subscribe to the Wordplay podcast in iTunes).
Story by K.M. Weiland
Tags: dilemma , Feature , scenes , sequels , Showing , story structure , structuring your story's scenes , summarization , SYN , Telling














This is practically an overview of my story arc. Hope that's okay.
You mean the review/analyze/plan structure? As long there's some action leading up to a climax, you should be fine.
I never really thought of dilemma in terms of scene/sequel. But, reviewing one of my last sequels, my MC's worried they'll catch the serial killer before he kills again, in time for her to revive the last murder victim, and whether putting herself out there as a target was the brightest idea... Lot on her plate!
I've have not gotten to the sequel yet, right now I'm struggling just to plot the day by day schedule. Usually I plot out the whole day, and then figure out the scenes and sequels then.D:
@Liberty: Sounds like a perfect sequel dilemma.
@Sarah: Interesting approach. Is the daily structure important to your story (I'm imagining something along the lines of 24)?
Yea basically events and sequels are based on the hour out of twenty four.
I think this will be easier after I've figured out the characters primary struggle. For example a young boy who loves to read ghost stories, is struggling to let go of his books to board an evacuation ship. And so the segments would be separated into hourly growth.
Once we know what our characters want - and what's keeping them from getting it on a soul-deep level - the rest of the story usually falls into place much easier.
Its almost goes beyond simply knowing what they want, but rather how to compress it to a short tangible piece. Such as: A young boy struggles with a school friendship.
Its important I ground the plot within the real world, even if its in a far flung science fiction locale. The tricky thing is figuring out scenes and sequels that are character driven. (It used to be easier when I wrote more.)
Like anything, writing is one of those things that comes easier with practice. The more we do it, the more habitual even the tougher techniques become.
Because of disparate world views, a father and daughter have an estranged relationship. He is a career military man and she possesses a compassionate and holistic worldview. When the zombie apocalypse hits, her father becomes the only option for refuge. As she travels across country to get to him, the things she has to do awaken her to the knowledge that the job her father had demanded that he be the way he was, and that his hardness is helping her survive. (Scene). The (sequel) to this is when she gets to his location and it is already overrun and she has to "kill " her own father who is now a zombie. The lack of refuge and the inability to reconcile to her father sends her into a tailspin. (Dilemma) Those survivors that she has led through the story will rally her to pick up the pieces.
Ouch. Nice way to up the stakes on the personal moral dilemma.