Conflict is the life’s blood of fiction. Conflict means
something’s happening. Conflict brings change. And there’s also the little
matter of human nature’s voyeuristic fascination with other people’s confrontations. “No conflict, no story” is a rule of fiction familiar to even the noobiest of
noob writers. We’re told to pack in the conflict. Make sure there’s conflict on
every page. When the story feels slow, just add a little more conflict. Conflict,
conflict, conflict—it’s the fiction fix-all.
But is it?
Turns out conflict isn’t the wonder drug we may have thought.
For example, let’s consider that last bit of advice: “When the story feels
slow, just add a little more conflict.” On the surface, it’s pretty good
advice. But, if we dig a little deeper, we’re going to find it’s also pretty
problematic.
Your Story’s Conflict Is Broken
Why? Because conflict is only interesting or compelling within the context of the plot. In other
words, conflict, just for the sake of
conflict, is not only just as boring as zero conflict, it’s also much more
difficult for readers to swallow whole. Dwight V. Swain, in his canonical Techniques of the Selling Writer,
explains:
[Your reader] demands that your character’s efforts have
meaning. They must be the consequences of prior development and the product of
intelligence and direction. So, unless you’ve planted proper motivation, he’ll
resent it if your boxer, for no apparent reason, slugs a cop or stomps the
arena doorman. Nor will he be satisfied, for that matter, if a gang of young
hoodlums chooses this particular moment to pelt your vanquished warrior with
rotten eggs, not even knowing who he is.
So there goes that random argument about which of our
characters was supposed to buy eggs. In the context of our save-the-world-from-a-nuclear-holocaust
thriller, an argument about eggs is going to be pointless. Likely, we’re only
sticking it in there because we don’t know what else to write. The story has
stalled, and we don’t know what’s supposed to happen in the next scene. But something has to happen in this scene and it had better include conflict. Enter the eggs argument.
Often, this is yet another symptom of the meandering or goal-less character.
Creating Meaningful Story Conflict
If some types of conflict don’t cut it, how do you know
which types are acceptable? Generally, of course, you’re looking for conflict
that makes sense within the scope of the plot. You’re looking for conflict that
flows from the plot. But how do you know when conflict flows from the plot?
It all comes down to character. And not just character
personality, but, much more specifically, character motivations, goals, and
reactions. The kind of conflict that drives stories is that which arises from a
direct opposition to the protagonist’s goals.
If the presence of eggs in the protagonist’s refrigerator has
no effect on his story or scene goals, then the egg conflict has no place in
the story. On the other hand, if the absence of those eggs is going to spell
doom (or perhaps just delay) for his dreams, that’s the kind of conflict I want to read about.
Subtle or Sidelong Story Conflict
While we’re at it, let’s also note that this integral conflict we’re talking about doesn’t always have to be overt. It could
be the eggs in the above argument won’t have any direct impact on the characters, but the argument
about the eggs might be symbolic of a deeper, unstated conflict between the
characters—one which will present
inherent obstacles.
Story by K.M. Weiland
Tags:
conflict
,
Feature
,
goals
,
reaction
,
SYN
I'm constantly amazed by how our thoughts are in accord KM. I'm about one-tenth the way through a crime novel and I was thinking about a characters goal, and was about to add a scene of high conflict but decided against it. The story simply was not ready for it. In fact, with this character it would be out of character to act or re-act violently at this particular point.
I just wanted to keep the story going and thought this might be one method of doing that. Had I chosen that path and not read your post I might have ruined the story. So thanks for the timely comment. Again, you have helped me as a writer. Thank you.
Great minds, great minds. ;) Glad the post was timely for you! A book is such a large and intricate thing, and we have to keep the whole thing in our heads at once in order to understand how to best use the conflict at certain moments. A scene that might be perfect at one point in the book could bring the whole thing crashing down were we to stick it in at a different moment. It's really just a vast juggling act.
i like these articles make me think -
i argue its merits back & forth, applying and checking the fit, and almost always find it worthwhile
this particular go 'round, i decided / found / realized my conflict-preference alternates 'tween external and internal, in its own rhythm -
at least at this time ;-)
thanks k.m., take care
Eggs?! Eggs were actually a foreshadowing element in the season seven Doctor Who opener. A character trapped in a spaceship spent a year making souffles, and the Doctor asked where she got the milk (eggs) from...it was a hint for something really big.
I think that was a justified foreshadowing(I saw that episode too!) because it was interesting and not really an argument anyway, and because it foreshadowed that big thing.
I don't think I have this problem as much, but this is a good thing to look out for. I stick to the plot in my head and the characters and the emotions and morals behind them.
Thanks for clearing up that conflict that happens outside the story doesn't need to be there!!
I love writing conflict... but sometimes, I do have to force myself to do it. I've got a scene that I've been working on that didn't have a bunch of conflict in it originally, and I decided it needed to be punched up... it's still feeling false to me--both ways. Before the change and after it. You have to make sure you get the right balance, and the characters aren't betraying themselves.
@Adan: Finding the balance between internal and external conflict is important. One without the other is like a sandwich with either peanut butter or jelly - but not both.
@Galadriel: See, even eggs *can* create good conflict!
@Writer4Christ: "Sticking to the plot," as such, is usually a good way to avoid meaningless conflict. Even still, it's often the beginning of scenes, before we've quite figured out how we're going to develop that plot, that these failed conflicts often crop up.
@Traci: That's a good way to phrase it.
@Liberty: It all comes down to character. If a conflict - or the characters' reactions to it - don't ring true to personality and motive, it won't ever work.
ӏn fact ωhen somеοnе doesn't understand afterward its up to other users that they will help, so here it takes place.
my web site - Extramoneyinfo.net
Excellent items from you, man. I have consider your stuff previous to
and you are simply too fantastic. I actually like what you've obtained here, certainly like what you are saying and the way in which through which you say it. You're making it entertaining
and you continue to care for to stay it smart. I can't wait to read much more from you. That is actually a terrific web site.
my web site - oven repair Valrico